| Astrologers Resti Santiago and Paloma with journalist turned lawmaker Loren Legarda and Anthony Vivero, around 1999 |
By MARGE C. ENRIQUEZ
The late Zenaida “Kid” Garcia, better known to readers
as Paloma, first reached out to BusinessWorld in 1991 with a complaint that
another astrologer had copied her work. She sent proof, then offered to write.
The paper ran her first essay, and she soon became a regular columnist.
Writing as Paloma, she kept her identity private to
pursue a mission to explain astrology. The aim was to counter the view that astrology
is only planetary positions or past-life claims. Her column educated general
readers and showed that life involves both destiny and personal choice. Change
rests with the individual, not with the moon or planets. Years of practice, she
said, deepened her faith and clarified the laws of cause and effect. Astrology,
in her view, can reveal patterns behind turning points and highlight universal
laws whose neglect leads to consequences. Religion, for her, is the psyche’s
core rather than an institution built on rules.
Paloma wrote on feng shui, profiles of presidential
candidates, relationships and the pace of change. When readers asked why her
byline had no photo, editors said she preferred to keep attention on the work. The
newspaper’s Arts & Leisure section valued substance over personality, and
Paloma fit that approach. The astrologer avoided talking about her personal
history.
She came out of a corporate career, where rising
through the ranks left her uneasy about material success, and went to the
United States to study astrology as a personal reset. In the Philippines,
critics brush off astrology as hokey and devotees treat it as occult practice.
She said it is neither. Many countries regard it as an exact science and a tool
for decision-making, that some U.S. universities even offer doctoral programs.
Her push was to improve standards and ethics among
Filipino astrologers and to address public miseducation. She said many
practitioners have inadequate, theory-heavy training that often proves
irrelevant. Some chase attention and bury clients in jargon and complicated
charts without turning findings into usable guidance.
"I am not the kind of astrologer who amplifies
the client’s virtues found under a horoscope," Paloma said. "Those
are positive, given factors that need less attention. I focus more on the
problem areas of a chart where growth must occur. I also do not attempt
interpretations that confuse the reader. Unfortunately, this is what happens
with most astrologers who pander to shallow or obsolete occult books and pass
their readings off as gospel. They block new intuitive discoveries and the
open-mindedness of a sensitive astrologer."
Comments
Post a Comment